Skip to main content

Month: January 2025

Aston University and Birmingham Children’s Hospital study shows diagnosis and treatment of preschool wheeze needs improvement

A study led by Aston University’s Dr Gemma Heath and  Dr Prasad Nagakumar from Birmingham Children’s Hospital – both BHP member organisations – has shown that treatment and diagnosis for preschool wheeze needs more effective evidence-based guidelines.

Preschool wheeze affects approximately 30–40% of children under six. The condition is characterised by episodes of wheezing or breathlessness, with younger children being particularly susceptible due to their narrower airways. Although it can resemble asthma, preschool wheeze is often triggered by viral infections or allergies and does not always mean a child will develop asthma.

The UK has Europe’s second highest prevalence of preschool wheeze in two-year-olds and is a leading cause of emergency hospital visits and hospitalisations in the country. Repeated preschool wheeze attacks are frightening for parents, and result in significant morbidity, healthcare costs and impaired quality of life for both the child and parent.

There is currently no diagnostic pathway or definitive management guidelines for preschool wheeze. The research team interviewed affected parents and carers about their experiences, and found problems with diagnosis and treatment at multiple levels.

The first major issue identified by parents was inconsistent terminologies used by doctors, and confusing and conflicting diagnoses such as asthma, suspected asthma, viral wheeze and allergy. Some reported frustration at the lack of definitive diagnosis, an apparent lack of GP knowledge, sometimes false reassurance that the wheeze was viral rather than asthma, or that the cause was a “mystery”.

A common problem was that investigative tests did not occur until after multiple hospitalisations. Blood tests for particular markers have potential to identify whether asthma or an allergy is likely to have caused the wheeze, and therefore guide treatment. The parents in the study welcomed the idea of timely tests, but stressed that children should not be subjected to repeated testing.

Preschool wheeze is generally managed with steroid and salbutamol inhalers, as for asthma. While parents had concerns about the side-effects and long-term impacts of using the treatments, they deemed the medication “an acceptable cost”.

Parents reported being “terrified” while watching attacks of preschool wheeze, and significant psychological impacts when their child was admitted to hospital. Some had missed work or even given up work to care for their child, with high levels of anxiety, while others said they felt unable to go on holiday overseas due to concerns about healthcare access in the case of a wheeze attack.

Most parents preferred to access care at hospital rather that at doctors’ surgeries due to the perception of a lack of training for GPs and a lack of confidence. However, accessing necessary care can be difficult, including due to childcare difficulties, the cost of hospital parking and a lack of available ambulances.

The research team said that parents’ views highlight the problems and called for clinical trials to determine the efficacy of treatment decisions made according to the results of investigations.

Dr Heath said: “This research demonstrates an urgent need for preschool wheeze management policies and treatment pathways that are evidence-based and co-developed with parents. We have shown that use of investigations such as blood or allergy tests would be acceptable to parents, if they were shown to be helpful in guiding more effective and timely treatments.”

Dr Nagakumar said: “Preschool wheeze has significant impact on young children’s and their parents’ lives. Our research, involving parents with lived experience, will inform future studies to improve the care and reduce the impact of preschool wheeze on the already-stretched emergency health services in the UK.”

Archives of Disease in Childhood doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327781

Increasing transparency and tackle potential bias in medical AI technologies: BHP researchers publish new recommendations

Patients will be better able to benefit from innovations in medical artificial intelligence (AI) if a new set of internationally agreed recommendations – published in The Lancet Digital Health and NEJM AI – are followed.

Led by the University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NH Foundation Trust, ‘STANDING Together (STANdards for data Diversity, INclusivity and Generalisability)’ is an international initiative and its recommendations are based on a research study involving more than 350 experts from 58 countries, aiming to help improve the way datasets are used to build Artificial intelligence (AI) health technologies and reduce the risk of potential AI bias. 

Innovative medical AI technologies may improve diagnosis and treatment for patients, however some studies have shown that medical AI can be biased, meaning that it works well for some people and not for others. This means some individuals and communities may be ‘left behind’ or may even be harmed when these technologies are used.

The STANDING Together recommendations aim to ensure that medical AI can be safe and effective for everyone. They cover many factors which can contribute to AI bias, including:

  • Encouraging medical AI to be developed using appropriate healthcare datasets that properly represent everyone in society, including minoritised and underserved groups;
  • Helping anyone who publishes healthcare datasets to identify any biases or limitations in the data;
  • Enabling those developing medical AI technologies to assess whether a dataset is suitable for their purposes;
  • Defining how AI technologies should be tested to identify if they are biased, and so work less well in certain people. 

Dr Xiao Liu, Associate Professor of AI and Digital Health Technologies at the University of Birmingham and Chief Investigator of the study said: “Data is like a mirror, providing a reflection of reality. And when distorted, data can magnify societal biases. But trying to fix the data to fix the problem is like wiping the mirror to remove a stain on your shirt. To create lasting change in health equity, we must focus on fixing the source, not just the reflection.”

The STANDING Together recommendations aim to ensure that the datasets used to train and test medical AI systems represent the full diversity of the people that the technology will be used for. This is because AI systems often work less well for people who aren’t properly represented in datasets.

People who are in minority groups are particularly likely to be under-represented in datasets, so may be disproportionately affected by AI bias. Guidance is also given on how to identify those who may be harmed when medical AI systems are used, allowing this risk to be reduced.

Professor Kiran Patel, Chief Medical Officer at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB), said: “In the UK, and especially in cities like Birmingham, where communities from diverse backgrounds form a significant part of the population, ensuring diversity in datasets is essential for improving health outcomes for all patients.”

“As technology advances, these recommendations are crucial in preventing the health inequalities we know exist in our communities from persisting or worsening, ensuring vulnerable populations have access to the treatments they need.”

The research has been conducted with collaborators from over 30 institutions worldwide, including universities, regulators (UK, US, Canada and Australia), patient groups and charities, and small and large health technology companies.

The work has been funded by The Health Foundation and the NHS AI Lab and supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), the research partner of the NHS, public health and social care.

In addition to the recommendations themselves, a commentary published in Nature Medicine written by the STANDING Together patient representatives highlights the importance of public participation in shaping medical AI research.    

Sir Jeremy Farrar, Chief Scientist of the World Health Organisation, said:  “Ensuring we have diverse, accessible and representative datasets to support the responsible development and testing of AI is a global priority. The STANDING Together recommendations are a major step forward in ensuring equity for AI in health”

Dominic Cushnan, Deputy Director for AI at NHS England, said: “It is crucial that we have transparent and representative datasets to support the responsible and fair development and use of AI. The STANDING Together recommendations are highly timely as we leverage the exciting potential of AI tools and NHS AI Lab fully supports the adoption of their practice to mitigate AI bias’’

The recommendations were published on Wednesday 18 December 2024, and are available open access via The Lancet Digital Health.

You might also be interested in: