Skip to main content

Patient symptom and quality of life assessments must be inclusive and equitable

Information reported directly by patients can be invaluable for assessing the impact of disease and treatment on patients’ symptoms and quality of life -but more needs to be done to include under-served groups to avoid rising inequalities in healthcare, say experts at BHP founder-member the University of Birmingham.

The information is commonly collected in both clinical trials and clinical practice and ensures that the patient’s perspective is at the heart of decision making. As use of these data become more commonplace, however, researchers in the University’s Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research are calling for more to be done to ensure such information can be provided by everybody.

In an article published 5 May 2022 in Nature Medicine, researchers in collaboration with patients, regulators and international experts identify some of the barriers to participation such as access to technology, disability, language and cultural requirements and call for these to be addressed.

Lead author, Professor Melanie Calvert, said: “When we start to embrace new approaches to healthcare, such as use of patient-reported outcomes, we need to make sure that barriers to participation are addressed at an early stage. If we don’t do this, the gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged populations will only get worse.

“Representative diversity in clinical trials is vital to ensure new medicines and technologies are applicable to the population they are intended to serve. Targeted initiatives are needed to ensure that no groups are excluded from participation in patient-reported outcome data collection, both in research settings and routine clinical care.”

Specific recommendations in the article include:

      • Improve diversity by involving individuals who represent target populations when designing patient questionnaires.
      • Consider the type and severity of disease when seeking patient views, including cognitive or functional impairment that would limit participation.
      • Be aware of cultural needs or languages that might be a barrier, and address these sensitively and appropriately.
      • Include individuals with all levels of reading, writing and problem solving abilities by ensuring material is accessible and that assistance is available, if required.
      • Provide alternative methods of participation to promote digital inclusion
      • Where information is being used in drug development, make sure inclusivity is included early on in discussions about data collection.

Rav Verdi, a patient partner who co-authored the work, said: “As a patient and living in a cosmopolitan society it’s encouraging to see that all walks of life have been considered and a means of communication thought about to glean information from the patient and to provide information to the patient regarding their care and treatment. As worldwide issue, information could be shared with treatment centres to provide better care and understanding of different groups of the population.”

Roger Wilson, a patient partner adds: “Listening to patients reveals the range of diversity which must be understood and allowed for by careful design if a study is to offer benefits to society equitably.”

Professor Calvert adds: “Patient-reported outcome measures and data collection must be reflective of diverse and multicultural societies, to improve research and promote equitable clinical care for the benefit of all patients and the public as a whole.”

The team are supported by a number of funders including the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre Birmingham and Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Health Data Research UK and UK SPINE.

Funding boost to help improve ovarian cancer survival rates

BHP’s newest member NHS Trust has been given a charity grant of £100,000 to help improve survival rates of women with ovarian cancer.

The Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, based at SWBH’s City Hospital, is working jointly with University of Cambridge to boost the uptake in genetic testing, especially in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic communities (BAME) where survival rates are low.

The project, called the Demonstration of Improvement for Molecular Ovarian cancer testing (DEMO), will create information about genetic testing in various languages both in leaflet and video format. The project will also improve the quality of the sample taken to aid diagnosis when there is suspicion of ovarian cancer by establishing a guidance document for all healthcare professionals involved in the process.

Dr Elaine Leung, Clinical Lecturer and Specialist Registrar at the Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Centre which is run by Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, said: “This is a much-needed project reaching those diverse communities in the area.

“With the support of our patient representatives, the materials we co-create will be in an easy-to-understand format in both written and video form, which will give women a better understanding of the link between cancer and genetic testing.

“It’s important to ensure women know that genetic testing is similar to early detection and can help prolong life – we have already seen evidence of this through other studies.

“It helps to provide tailored treatments for patients and ultimately can mean surviving an ovarian cancer diagnosis.

“The lack of informed decision-making resources for women whose first language is not English could be a contributor to the low rates of testing within these communities. The team will co-produce information in multiple languages, as well as exploring why some groups of women are more likely to decline genetic testing.”

The project has been funded by health charity Ovarian Cancer Action and is part of a wider national initiative which includes funding for five other NHS cancer centres.

The Pan-Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Network delivers cancer care to more than two million people in the West Midlands.

The project also builds on the team’s previous experience with the genetic testing studies, looking at BRCA testing in women with a new diagnosis of ovarian cancer before it became mainstream practice.

Lisa Bird, a former cancer patient who is part of the project, said: “When I was in my thirties I was diagnosed with ovarian cancer, which was a large shock.  My first line treatment successfully got me into remission but I wanted to know what options would be available to me if I came out of remission.

“I investigated treatment options and found that there were some treatments only available to those that have the BRCA 1 and 2 genes.  I also wanted to know if other family members were at an increased genetic risk of also getting ovarian cancer, so that I could warn them of the symptoms and ensure that they received better monitoring by their GPs.

“I’m really pleased to be part of the DEMO project team that will encourage more patients to have these same tests. I’m passionate that anyone affected by ovarian cancer should be able to have this genetic knowledge so that their healthcare teams can give them the best treatments available to them as quickly as possible. I really believe that the results of this project will help to provide patients with ovarian cancer, with a greater chance of an extended life.”

£7m funding boost for world-leading surgical research team

A world-leading global surgical research team led from BHP founder member the University of Birmingham has received £7 million of funding to continue its life-saving work in developing countries – finding ways of increasing surgical capacity and preventing post-operative complications.

The NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery (NIHR GSU) will focus on training non-surgeons to perform essential hernia operations – hernias posing a major problem with five million patients awaiting surgery in sub-Saharan Africa, stopping young men from providing for their families.

The team will also continue its work in boosting post-operative recovery in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMICs) – testing simple innovations such as the use of high-dose oxygen, mouthwashes and inhalers.

Researchers are also looking to bring innovation back into the health systems of high-income countries by piloting innovative practices in LMICs – proving their worth ahead of wider roll-out.

Established in 2017, the new NIHR funding will allow the GSU to continue its global research for at least a further five years. The Unit co-ordinates a global network of surgeons that includes over 20,000 clinicians from over 100 countries.

Based at the University of Birmingham, it is co-directed by Professor Dion Morton OBE, Barling Chair of Surgery and Professor Stephen Tabiri, Dean of the Medical School at University for Development Studies in Tamale, Ghana.

Professor Dion Morton commented: “Delivering safe and effective surgical care across the world is one of the greatest challenges facing global health today. Our work impacts the most disadvantaged and vulnerable populations of the world – we are training surgeons in these countries to continue the research drive that is helping to save lives.

“Surgical capacity is a critical issue – a matter of life and death. In many developing countries, there are simply not enough surgeons to deliver the operations that are needed – there are less than 100 general surgeons working in the Benin health service to serve a population of 12 million people.

“Equally, it’s no use performing more operations if patients are at risk of dying from post-operative complications. Simple but effective steps in reducing risks such as surgical site infection (SSI) – the most common post-surgical complication – will be vital in ensuring improved health outcomes for people living in LMICs.”

The GSU’s international cohort studies are open to all collaborators – whether medical students, clinical officers, doctors, nurses or researchers. The team works across clinical disciplines with healthcare professionals, policy makers, epidemiologists, economists, patients and community members.

The GSU provides the tools and infrastructure to help surgeons around the world to sustain the research drive that will increase surgical capacity in LMICs.

A ‘hub and spoke model’ helps the GSU co-ordinate surgical research globally in seven LMICs: India, South Africa, Rwanda, Nigeria, Benin, Ghana and Mexico. Each hub acts as an independent research centre for conducting clinical trials and cohort studies, as well as supporting local and international research training and education. The network consists of more than 100 urban and rural hospitals in these seven countries, some in the most remote parts of the world.

The GSU runs a range of cohort studies, qualitative research and clinical trials aimed at:

Diabetes: Birmingham launches five new research studies

BHP founder-member the University of Birmingham has announced the launch of five new major studies aimed at improving the prevention, treatment and management of type 1 diabetes – with a particular focus on children and young adults.

The new studies include:

  • The ELSA Study: Led by Professor Parth Narendran, the ELSA Study (EarLy Surveillance for Autoimmune diabetes) will see researchers interviewing families, doctors, nurses and schools, to determine if, and how, the UK should develop a testing and monitoring programme that will identify children at risk of type 1 diabetes. The ELSA Study is being funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), and is being carried out in collaboration with Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and the Department of Health and Social Care, as well as the Universities of Cardiff, Warwick, Oxford and Imperial College London.
  • Diabetes and health inequalities: Through £1.9m funding from NIHR, Professor Tim Barrett’s team will ask children and young people with diabetes and their families from poorer and/ or ethnic minority backgrounds how language issues, feelings, income, living conditions and food availability affect how they manage diabetes. They will identify new ways to make diabetes management easier and more successful, and will test these systems in trials involving NHS hospitals.
  • Immunotherapies for diabetes: The greatest barrier to the development of specific immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes is that we currently do not understand the mechanism of how immunotherapies switch off the immune response to our own proteins. A clinical study led by Professor David Wraith, and funded by $735,000 from The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, will be carried out in collaboration with Cardiff University. It will test a new peptide developed by the University of Birmingham, work which was also funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust with a $610,000 grant. The new peptide has the potential to control the T-cell immune response in people who are either at risk of developing type 1 diabetes or are newly diagnosed. In this study, the team will assess the changes in immune cells from the site of injection, the draining lymph nodes and peripheral blood. This will be the first in-depth analysis of the molecular changes responsible for antigen-specific immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes.
  • Sight loss and diabetes: Two separate projects led by Dr Jose Romero Hombrebueno will explore the function of membrane-bound cell organelles, known as mitochondria, which generate most of the chemical energy needed to power the cell’s biochemical reactions. The researchers will examine the role of mitochondrial function in both the development of multiple health conditions as the consequence of type 1 diabetes, and also the role it plays in developing diabetic retinopathy – an eye condition that can cause sight loss and blindness in people who have diabetes. The latter research is being funded by Diabetes UK, while the former is being funded by the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes.
  • Exercise and type 1 diabetes: Led by Dr Alex Wadley and funded by the Rosetrees Trust, this research will examine how a home-based exercise programme impacts autoimmunity in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. The project will evaluate whether exercise slows the progression of type 1 diabetes by altering the number and activity of white blood cells in the circulation that have the potential to attach to, enter and degrade the pancreas. Although evidence supports a role for exercise to promote general health and wellbeing in patients with type 1 diabetes, this project aims to provide novel evidence that exercise can directly slow the progression of the disease upon diagnosis.

Parth Narendran, Professor of Diabetes Medicine at the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, said: “The UK has one of the highest incidences of type 1 diabetes in the developed world, at 25 per 100,000 per year, and type 1 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in children. It occurs when cells that make insulin don’t work as they should, and people with the condition have to self-inject insulin for their entire lives. Studies have recently shown that some medicines can safely delay people getting type 1 diabetes. Some countries, such as the US and Australia, already have surveillance systems to identify people at risk of developing type 1 diabetes and to offer them participation in prevention trials and also to reduce their chances of developing type 1 diabetes as an unexpected emergency. The UK does not have such a system in place. Until now, nobody in the UK has explored whether parents and children would welcome such a system, and how it would work. Through ELSA we will potentially be able to change NHS healthcare policy which would result in the early detection and prevention of this condition and its associated long-term complications.”

Timothy Barrett, Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health at the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, said: “Diabetes causes high blood sugar levels, which can lead to eye and kidney damage if the condition is not well managed. We know that better sugar control reduces this risk, however, children with diabetes from poorer and/ or ethnic minority groups, often have worse sugar control, while these complications often develop when they are young adults who are working and starting families. There is little evidence to show any previous interventions have helped in reducing health inequalities for children with diabetes in different groups. We will work with young people, their families, and diabetes clinicians to develop an action plan that families feel comfortable with and that will support them to improve their self-management.”

Professor David Wraith, Director of the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, said: “Studies have shown that immunotherapies could play a vital role in treating type 1 diabetes, and it’s essential that we can develop new drugs that could specifically target cells that cause the body’s immune response to behave the wrong way in a person with type 1 diabetes. Our project will help improve our understanding of how the human body’s immune system responds to therapies, which in turn will help the development of new treatments.”

Dr Jose Romero Hombrebueno, Hale-Rudd Lecturer in Experimental Ophthalmology at the University of Birmingham’s Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, said: “It is estimated that 224 million people will have diabetic retinopathy and 70 million will have sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy by 2040. Nearly 90-95% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 78% with type 2 diabetes are expected to develop minimal retinal damage after having diabetes for more than 15 years. Therefore it’s essential that we carry our research that will help advance our knowledge of the underlying causes and potential ways to treat or prevent vision loss in those with diabetes.”

Dr Alex Wadley, of the University of Birmingham’s School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, said: It’s estimated that around 70% of patients with type 1 diabetes do not meet the current recommended exercise guidelines of 150 minutes per week. We are using a home-based exercise programme, which has proven highly popular and safe for individuals with type 1 diabetes, to evaluate how regular exercise impacts the immune system of newly diagnosed patients. Type 1 diabetes is a disease where the body’s own white blood cells attack the pancreas and stop insulin production, resulting in high blood sugar. Regular participation in exercise is key to supporting health and wellbeing in people with type 1 diabetes, but we don’t know how exercise directly impacts these white blood cells that do the damage. With limited therapies available for patients currently, we hope that our findings can promote the use of exercise as an important lifestyle choice for patients and impact standard treatment approaches for type 1 diabetes nationally.’’

Artificial Intelligence project aims to improve diversity and equality in AI systems

A new project has been launched across BHP members, aiming to address racial and ethical health inequalities using artificial intelligence (AI).

STANDING Together, being led by BHP founding member University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB), aims to develop standards for datasets that AI systems use, to ensure they are diverse, inclusive and work across all demographic groups. The resulting standards will help regulators, commissioners, policymakers and health data institutions assess whether AI systems are underpinned by datasets that represent everyone, and don’t leave underrepresented or minority groups behind.

Xiao Liu, Clinical Researcher in Artificial Intelligence and Digital Healthcare at the University of Birmingham and UHB, and STANDING Together project co-leader, said: “We’re looking forward to starting work on our project, and developing standards that we hope will improve the use of AI both in the UK and around the world. We believe AI has enormous potential to improve patient care, but through our earlier work on producing AI guidelines, we also know that there is still lots of work to do to make sure AI is a success stories for all patients. Through the STANDING Together project, we will work to ensure AI benefits all patients and not just the majority.”

NHSX’ NHS AI Lab, the NIHR, and the Health Foundation have awarded in total £1.4m to four projects, including STANDING Together. The other organisations working with BHP on STANDING Together are the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Health Data Research UK, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and The Hospital for Sick Children (Sickkids, Toronto).

The NHS AI Lab introduced the AI Ethics Initiative to support research and practical interventions that complement existing efforts to validate, evaluate and regulate AI-driven technologies in health and care, with a focus on countering health inequalities. Today’s announcement is the result of the Initiative’s partnership with The Health Foundation on a research competition, enabled by NIHR, to understand and enable opportunities to use AI to address inequalities and to optimise datasets and improve AI development, testing and deployment.

Brhmie Balaram, Head of AI Research and Ethics at NHSX, said: “We’re excited to support innovative projects that demonstrate the power of applying AI to address some of our most pressing challenges; in this case, we’re keen to prove that AI can potentially be used to close gaps in minority ethnic health outcomes. Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionise care for patients, and we are committed to ensuring that this potential is realised for all patients by accounting for the health needs of diverse communities.”

Dr Indra Joshi, Director of the NHS AI Lab at NHSX, added: “As we strive to ensure NHS patients are amongst the first in the world to benefit from leading AI, we also have a responsibility to ensure those technologies don’t exacerbate existing health inequalities. These projects will ensure the NHS can deploy safe and ethical Artificial Intelligence tools that meet the needs of minority communities and help our workforce deliver patient-centred and inclusive care to all.”

The STANDING Together team can be contacted at contact@datadiversity.org

SPIRIT-PRO extension: guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in protocols of clinical trials

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) can provide valuable evidence on the impact of disease and treatment on patients’ symptoms, function and quality of life. High-quality PRO data from trials can inform clinical care, regulatory decisions and health policy. However, problems such as poor data collection, analysis, reporting and interpretation often reduce or negate their value. This paper attempts to raise standards by enhancing the international SPIRIT-PRO guidelines that were created to optimise the design of clinical trials and encourage the consistent, high-quality reporting of PROs and ultimately to inform patient-centred care. This case study originally appeared on the HDR UK website – visit to read further health data case studies.

Challenge

The PRO content of past trial protocols has often been incomplete or unclear leading to research waste. An appraisal of the PRO content of >350 past trial protocols showed that many lacked the specific information needed for high-quality PRO data collection and evidence generation. As a result this may lead to poor quality or non-reporting of PRO trial results, which may hinder the potential for PRO evidence to be used in regulatory decision-making, health policy and clinical care

The SPIRIT-PRO guidance and the subsequent SPIRIT-PRO Extension (a 16-item checklist intended to improve the content and quality of aspects of clinical trial protocols relating to PRO data collection) were created to establish standards to improve the content and quality of trial protocols. However, further work is required to support uptake and implementation.

Solution

A team led by Melanie Calvert, NIHR Senior Investigator, Professor of Outcomes Methodology at the University of Birmingham and Director of Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research and Professor Madeleine King, University of Sydney, have developed tools to support the use of SPIRIT-PRO by researchers to generate high quality PRO data to inform patient care. This includes a protocol template, detailed descriptions and examples of good practice.

Impact and outcomes

While trial protocols are the foundation for study planning, conduct, reporting and appraisal, they vary greatly in content and quality. By providing specific recommendations about PRO endpoints it is possible to improve the situation – providing valuable information for clinicians and patients about the risks, benefits and tolerability of an intervention.

The work carried out by Prof. Calvert, Prof. King, Dr Olalekan Aiyegbusi with international collaborators (supported by UCB Pharma, Macmillan Cancer Support, the NIHR and HDR UK) has the potential to dramatically improve the quality and value of PRO data gathering and reporting in clinical trials. This in turn has far-reaching implications for care – allowing patients and their care teams to understand how an intervention will affect someone, whether it is appropriate or if an alternative should be considered.

Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement

Patient partners were involved in the design, conduct, reporting and dissemination plans of the research. This included the development of the SPIRIT-PRO Extension, the paper, protocol template, tools to support implementation by patient partners. Patient partners are included as co-authors.

Insights from the HDR UK Impact Committee

The HDR UK Impact Committee serves to raise the profile of both ours and our contributors’ outputs. The Impact Committee are keen to celebrate significant impacts which clearly demonstrate the value of of our mission to unite the UK’s health data to enable discoveries that improve people’s lives.

Contact

Prof. Calvert: m.calvert@bham.ac.uk